Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 460 vs AMD FirePro M3900

AMD Radeon Pro 460 vs AMD FirePro M3900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 460 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 460 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Boost Clock907MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (81.28GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
864 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 460 +674%
1.858 TFLOPS
FirePro M3900
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Oct 2010
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
-
907 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
81.28GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
160
64
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
58.05 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
1.858 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.858 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
116.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Baffin
GPU Name
Seymour
Baffin XT
GPU Variant
Seymour GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy