Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206

AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 GM206 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 5300 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 33% (1650MHz vs 1239MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 85W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 5300 +232%
4.224 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 750 GM206
1.269 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2020
Release Date
Nov 2015
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1087 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
1239 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
512
80
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.65 GPixel/s
132.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.65 GTexel/s
8.448 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.224 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1269 GFLOPS
264.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
39.65 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
60W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
GM206
Navi 14 PRO XE
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.5
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy