Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 575X vs AMD FirePro M3900

AMD Radeon Pro 575X vs AMD FirePro M3900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 575X and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 575X 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (217.6GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1888 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 575X +1770%
4.489 TFLOPS
FirePro M3900
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2019
Release Date
Oct 2010
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1700 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
217.6GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
160
128
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

35.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
140.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
4.489 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.489 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
280.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Polaris 20
GPU Name
Seymour
Polaris 20 XL (215-0910052)
GPU Variant
Seymour GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy