Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 250W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Jan 2007
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x1

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
36
Compute Units
-
2304
Shading Units
-
144
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
RV516
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
R500
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
UMC
14 nm
Process Size
80 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
32W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy