Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 3850 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 52.99GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (140W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +1238%
5.728 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 3850 X2
0.428 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Apr 2008
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
828 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
52.99GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
320
144
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.70 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.70 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
428.2 GFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
85.63 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
140W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
RV670
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
RV670 PRO (215-0708003)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy