Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 645 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +503%
5.728 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 645 OEM
0.949 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Apr 2013
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
576
144
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.888 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.55 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
949.2 GFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
39.55 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
65W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
GK106
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
GK106-200-A1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Kepler
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy