Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GTO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 12.54GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Dec 2007
Radeon Pro Vega
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

852 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
945 MHz
Memory Clock
392 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR2
2048bit
Memory Bus
128bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
12.54GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
-
224
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.348 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.348 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

230W
TDP
Unknown
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 1x VGA
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
RV530
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
GPU Variant
RV530 LE
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
90 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy