Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V520 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

AMD Radeon Pro V520 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V520 and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V520 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 225W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2020
Release Date
Jan 2008
Radeon Pro
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
128MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR
2048bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
36
Compute Units
-
2304
Shading Units
-
144
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

102.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
14.75 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.373 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
460.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 12
GPU Name
RV380
Navi 12
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
130 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.075 billion
Unknown
Die Size
92 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
20W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
2.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy