Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V520 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

AMD Radeon Pro V520 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V520 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V520 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2088 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V520 +1275%
7.373 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2020
Release Date
Sep 2008
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
896MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
448bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
2304
Shading Units
216
144
TMUs
72
64
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

102.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
14.75 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.373 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
460.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
182W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 12
GPU Name
GT200
Navi 12
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.4 billion
Unknown
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy