CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon Pro V620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
AMD Radeon Pro V620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
VS
AMD Radeon Pro V620
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro V620 and 1280MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro V620 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 152.0GB/s)
4160 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 's Advantages
Lower TDP (210W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V620
+1445%
20.28 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
1.312 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V620
VS
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Graphics Card
Nov 2021
Release Date
Nov 2011
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
1280MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
152.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
14
72
Compute Units
-
4608
Shading Units
448
288
TMUs
56
128
ROPs
40
-
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
640 KB
Theoretical Performance
281.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.50 GPixel/s
633.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
40.99 GTexel/s
40.55 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
20.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1312 GFLOPS
1267 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
164.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Navi 21
GPU Name
GF110
Navi 21 XT (215-121000177)
GPU Variant
GF110-270-A1
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
3 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Board Design
300W
TDP
210W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090D vs AMD Radeon Pro V620
2
AMD Radeon 780M vs AMD Radeon Pro V620
3
AMD Radeon Pro V620 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1
4
AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro V620
5
AMD Radeon RX 6600 LE vs AMD Radeon Pro V620
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon Pro V620
7
AMD Radeon Pro V620 vs ATI FirePro V7900
8
AMD Radeon Pro V620 vs AMD FirePro S10000
9
AMD Radeon Pro V620 vs NVIDIA A40 PCIe
10
AMD Radeon Pro V620 vs AMD Radeon R7 260X
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy