Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 20 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1283MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (189.4GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Vega 20 +9%
3.284 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
2.989 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2018
Release Date
May 2015
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

815 MHz
Base Clock
-
1283 MHz
Boost Clock
-
740 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
1024bit
Memory Bus
256bit
189.4GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
1792
80
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

41.06 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.69 GPixel/s
102.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.41 GTexel/s
6.569 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.284 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.989 TFLOPS
205.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
373.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 12
GPU Name
Amethyst
Vega 12 XTA
GPU Variant
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GCN 5.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
5 billion
Unknown
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy