Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs ATI FirePro V4900

AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs ATI FirePro V4900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5500 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W5500 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1855MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 125W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W5500 +580%
5.224 TFLOPS
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2020
Release Date
Nov 2011
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1744 MHz
Base Clock
-
1855 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

22
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
1408
Shading Units
480
88
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
163.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
10.45 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.224 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
326.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

125W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
Turks
Navi 14 PRO XL
GPU Variant
Turks XT GL
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy