Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6800X vs AMD Radeon R9 280

AMD Radeon Pro W6800X vs AMD Radeon R9 280

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800X and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6800X 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 124% (2087MHz vs 933MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6800X +379%
16.03 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280
3.344 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Mar 2014
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
Apple MPX
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1800 MHz
Base Clock
827 MHz
2087 MHz
Boost Clock
933 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

60
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
3840
Shading Units
1792
240
TMUs
112
96
ROPs
32
-
-
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

200.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.86 GPixel/s
500.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.5 GTexel/s
32.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.03 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.344 TFLOPS
1002 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
836.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
200W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Apple MPX
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
Tahiti
Navi 21 Pro-XLA
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy