Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2600MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7700 +871%
31.95 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 285
3.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2023
Release Date
Sep 2014
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1900 MHz
Base Clock
-
2600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
48
Compute Units
28
3072
Shading Units
1792
192
TMUs
112
96
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

249.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.38 GPixel/s
499.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.8 GTexel/s
63.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.290 TFLOPS
31.95 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.290 TFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
205.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 32
GPU Name
Tonga
Navi 32
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
28.1 billion
Transistors
5 billion
346 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Board Design

190W
TDP
190W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy