Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7800 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7800 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2499MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
4472 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7800 +213138%
44.78 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2023
Release Date
May 2009
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1855 MHz
Base Clock
-
2499 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
11.12GB/s

Render Config

70
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
4480
Shading Units
8
280
TMUs
4
128
ROPs
4
-
-
-
70
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
64 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

319.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
699.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
89.56 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
44.78 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
1399 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

260W
TDP
23W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
G98
Navi 31
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy