Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3100 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 57.73GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 106W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3100 +107%
1.248 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
0.601 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Mar 2011
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
902 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
57.73GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
512
Shading Units
192
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.264 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.06 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
601.3 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.11 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
106W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
GF116
Lexa XT
GPU Variant
GF116-200-KA-A1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy