Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD FireStream 9170

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD FireStream 9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 105W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 +233%
1.658 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
Nov 2007
Radeon Pro
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
320
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
41.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
1.658 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.658 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
103.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
105W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Polaris 23
GPU Name
RV670
Polaris 23 XT GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy