Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
Boost Clock1546MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3200
1.658 TFLOPS
Radeon RX Vega Nano +663%
12.66 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon Pro
Generation
Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1247 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1546 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
409.6GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
4096
32
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.94 GPixel/s
41.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
395.8 GTexel/s
1.658 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.658 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.66 TFLOPS
103.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
791.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
175W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Polaris 23
GPU Name
Vega 10
Polaris 23 XT GL
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy