Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs ATI Radeon X1650 AGP

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs ATI Radeon X1650 AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
Feb 2007
Radeon Pro
Generation
Radeon R500 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
-
32
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
41.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
1.658 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.658 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
103.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Polaris 23
GPU Name
RV530
Polaris 23 XT GL
GPU Variant
RV530 X1650 (215CCCBKB12FG)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
90 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy