Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 340 OEM and 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 185W)
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 112% (1650MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 36.80GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 340 OEM
0.599 TFLOPS
CMP 40HX +1169%
7.603 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Feb 2021
Pirate Islands
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
1470 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
36.80GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
36
384
Shading Units
2304
24
TMUs
144
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
18.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
237.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.21 TFLOPS
599.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.603 TFLOPS
37.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
237.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
185W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
TU106
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
TU106-100-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy