Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 A320 vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

AMD Radeon R5 A320 vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 A320 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 A320 's Advantages
Boost Clock825MHz
AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 A320
0.528 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition +466%
2.989 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
May 2015
All-In-One
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

750 MHz
Base Clock
-
825 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1792
20
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.69 GPixel/s
16.50 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.41 GTexel/s
-
-
-
528.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.989 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
373.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
250W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Jet
GPU Name
Amethyst
Jet PRO (216-0856040)
GPU Variant
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.69 billion
Transistors
5 billion
56 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
2.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy