Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 250 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

AMD Radeon R7 250 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 and 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 1000W)
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1837MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
16384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250
0.717 TFLOPS
B200 SXM 192 GB +8558%
62.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Jan 2024
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Tesla Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1665 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1837 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
192GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM3e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
4100GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
132
512
Shading Units
16896
32
TMUs
528
16
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.09 GPixel/s
22.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
969.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
248.3 TFLOPS
716.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
62.08 TFLOPS
44.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.04 TFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
1000W
250 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
GB100
Cape Verde PRO
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Blackwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
208 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
9.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy