Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 250 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

AMD Radeon R7 250 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
Lower TDP (35W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250
0.717 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 2100 +74%
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Jun 2017
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
925 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
8
Compute Units
8
512
Shading Units
512
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

11.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
22.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
716.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
44.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Lexa
Cape Verde PRO
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy