Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 250X vs ATI FirePro V3900

AMD Radeon R7 250X vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250X and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 250X 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (72.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250X +94%
1.216 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Feb 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1125 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
72.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
480
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

15.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
38.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1216 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
76.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

80W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Turks
Cape Verde XT
GPU Variant
Turks GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy