Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX

AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 340 OEM and 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 125W)
NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 129% (1785MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 340 OEM
0.599 TFLOPS
CMP 30HX +739%
5.027 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Feb 2021
Pirate Islands
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
384
Shading Units
1408
24
TMUs
88
8
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
18.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
599.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
37.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
125W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
TU116
-
GPU Variant
TU116-100-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy