Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 A260 vs AMD Radeon E9550 MXM

AMD Radeon R7 A260 vs AMD Radeon E9550 MXM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 A260 and 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (1266MHz vs 980MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 A260
0.752 TFLOPS
Radeon E9550 MXM +675%
5.834 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Sep 2016
All-In-One
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1120 MHz
980 MHz
Boost Clock
1266 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
2304
24
TMUs
144
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.840 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.51 GPixel/s
23.52 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
182.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.834 TFLOPS
752.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.834 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
364.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
95W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Topaz
GPU Name
Ellesmere
Topaz XT (216-0858020)
GPU Variant
Ellesmere XT
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy