Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 A265 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

AMD Radeon R7 A265 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 A265 and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 26% (1038MHz vs 825MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 A265
0.633 TFLOPS
GeForce MX250 +25%
0.797 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Unknown
All-In-One
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

725 MHz
Base Clock
937 MHz
825 MHz
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
384
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.61 GPixel/s
19.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.91 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.46 GFLOPS
633.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
797.2 GFLOPS
39.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.91 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
10W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Opal
GPU Name
GP108B
Opal XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy