Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 M265 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M

AMD Radeon R7 M265 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 M265 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 M265 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock825MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
320 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 M265 +229%
0.633 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 160M
0.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Mar 2009
Gem System
Generation
GeForce 100M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

725 MHz
Base Clock
-
825 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
384
Shading Units
64
24
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
19.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
633.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
60W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Opal
GPU Name
G94
Opal XT
GPU Variant
N10E-GS1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy