Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
472 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM +2166%
0.952 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
0.042 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Jun 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
930 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
40
32
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.100 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.100 GTexel/s
-
-
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
42.00 GFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
RV610
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
RV610 LE AGP (215LKBALA15FG)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy