Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI FireGL V7700

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI FireGL V7700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 512MB VRAM FireGL V7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 72.06GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM +91%
0.952 TFLOPS
FireGL V7700
0.497 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Nov 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
930 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1126 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
72.06GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
320
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
-
-
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
RV670
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
RV670 GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy