CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI FireGL V7700
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI FireGL V7700
VS
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
ATI FireGL V7700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 512MB VRAM FireGL V7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 72.06GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM
+91%
0.952 TFLOPS
FireGL V7700
0.497 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM
VS
FireGL V7700
Graphics Card
Dec 2013
Release Date
Nov 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
930 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1126 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
72.06GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
320
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
-
-
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Cape Verde
GPU Name
RV670
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
RV670 GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
2
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI Radeon X800 GTO
3
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI
4
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010
5
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 5670 640SP Edition
6
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
7
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
8
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 AGP
9
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs Intel Xe DG1
10
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 PhysX Edition
Related News
1
NVIDIA GB202 Chip Unveiled for the First Time, to be Used in RTX 5090 with 512-bit GDDR7 Memory
2
Strix Halo Integrated Graphics Score Appears on Passmark, Currently Slightly Below RTX 3060 12GB
3
AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT
4
Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card
5
CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory
6
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
7
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
8
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
9
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
10
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy