Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI FirePro V4800

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI FirePro V4800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
112 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 69W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM +53%
0.952 TFLOPS
FirePro V4800
0.62 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Apr 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
930 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
400
32
TMUs
20
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.200 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.50 GTexel/s
-
-
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
620.0 GFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
69W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Redwood
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
Redwood XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy