CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI FirePro V4800
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI FirePro V4800
VS
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
ATI FirePro V4800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
112 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 69W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM
+53%
0.952 TFLOPS
FirePro V4800
0.62 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM
VS
FirePro V4800
Graphics Card
Dec 2013
Release Date
Apr 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
930 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
400
32
TMUs
20
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.200 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.50 GTexel/s
-
-
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
620.0 GFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
65W
TDP
69W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cape Verde
GPU Name
Redwood
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
Redwood XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2
2
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 545
3
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
4
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 6950
5
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB 9Gbps
6
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD Radeon R7 260X
7
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 6490
8
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 8510 OEM
9
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
10
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
Related News
1
Continuous Decline in DRAM Memory Prices: Downward Trend Intensifies
2
NVIDIA GB202 Chip Unveiled for the First Time, to be Used in RTX 5090 with 512-bit GDDR7 Memory
3
Strix Halo Integrated Graphics Score Appears on Passmark, Currently Slightly Below RTX 3060 12GB
4
AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT
5
Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card
6
CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory
7
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
8
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
9
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
10
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy