Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 320GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 63.36GB/s)
416 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 143W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM +317%
0.952 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
0.228 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Feb 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
930 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
792 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
320MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
63.36GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
512
Shading Units
96
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
20
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
80 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.26 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.62 GTexel/s
-
-
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
228.1 GFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
143W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
G80
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.0
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy