CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320
VS
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 320GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 63.36GB/s)
416 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 143W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM
+317%
0.952 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
0.228 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM
VS
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
Graphics Card
Dec 2013
Release Date
Feb 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
930 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
792 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
320MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
63.36GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
512
Shading Units
96
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
20
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
80 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.26 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.62 GTexel/s
-
-
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
228.1 GFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
65W
TDP
143W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Cape Verde
GPU Name
G80
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.0
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 10 GB
2
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs Intel Arc A310
3
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
4
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
5
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA P106 100
6
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
7
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 6250
8
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
9
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
10
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP
Related News
1
Intel's Entry-Level CPU Core Ultra 3 205 Spotted: Only One Model Available
2
Introducing the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX: A First Look at the Flagship Gaming Laptop CPU
3
AMD's Thunderous Strike: Ryzen 9 9950X3D Performance Scores Revealed for the First Time!
4
Continuous Decline in DRAM Memory Prices: Downward Trend Intensifies
5
NVIDIA GB202 Chip Unveiled for the First Time, to be Used in RTX 5090 with 512-bit GDDR7 Memory
6
Strix Halo Integrated Graphics Score Appears on Passmark, Currently Slightly Below RTX 3060 12GB
7
AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT
8
Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card
9
CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory
10
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
© 2025 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy