Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
440 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM +406%
0.952 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 320 OEM
0.188 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Feb 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
930 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
9
512
Shading Units
72
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.96 GTexel/s
-
-
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
187.5 GFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
43W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
GT215
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
GT215-250-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy