Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 X2

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
176 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 160W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM +1%
0.952 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 460 X2
0.942 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Mar 2011
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
930 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
7
512
Shading Units
336
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.814 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.26 GTexel/s
-
-
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
941.5 GFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.46 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
160W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
GF104
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
GF104-300-KB-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy