Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 4830

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 4830

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4830 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
Lower TDP (65W vs 95W)
ATI Radeon HD 4830 's Advantages
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM +29%
0.952 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4830
0.736 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Oct 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
930 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
640
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.200 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
736.0 GFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
147.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
95W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
RV770
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
RV770 LE (215-0669075)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy