Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 119% (2040MHz vs 930MHz)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W6300 +229%
3.133 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Jan 2022
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1512 MHz
930 MHz
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
32bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Navi 24
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
Navi 24
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy