Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 8800 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 220W)
AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 161% (2430MHz vs 930MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (624.1GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 8800 XT +1991%
19.91 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Navi IV(RX 8000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1295 MHz
930 MHz
Boost Clock
2430 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
2438 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
624.1GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
4096
32
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
64
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
233.3 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
622.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.81 TFLOPS
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.91 TFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
622.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
220W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a3x DisplayPort 2.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Navi 48
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
Navi 48 XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
4 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
Unknown
123 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy