Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock930MHz
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200 +74%
1.658 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Jul 2019
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
930 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
640
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.72 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.658 TFLOPS
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.658 TFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Polaris 23
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy