Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230

AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
976 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 270 1024SP +1114%
1.894 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 230
0.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Oct 2009
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
1024
Shading Units
48
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
156.0 GFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
G94B
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
G94-300-B1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy