Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X vs ATI FirePro V5800 DVI

AMD Radeon R9 280X vs ATI FirePro V5800 DVI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V5800 DVI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1248 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V5800 DVI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (74W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X +271%
4.096 TFLOPS
FirePro V5800 DVI
1.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Apr 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
800
128
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.04 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
27.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1104 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
74W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Juniper
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
Juniper XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.04 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
166 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy