Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (125W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285
3.29 TFLOPS
CMP 30HX +52%
5.027 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Feb 2021
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
1792
Shading Units
1408
112
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

190W
TDP
125W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
TU116
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
TU116-100-A1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy