Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs AMD FirePro W8100

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs AMD FirePro W8100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 8GB VRAM FirePro W8100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Lower TDP (190W vs 220W)
AMD FirePro W8100 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285
3.29 TFLOPS
FirePro W8100 +28%
4.219 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Jun 2014
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
2560
112
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.74 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
131.8 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.219 TFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.109 TFLOPS

Board Design

190W
TDP
220W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Hawaii
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL40
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy