Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 70.40GB/s)
1680 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (120W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285 +806%
3.29 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
0.363 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Jul 2009
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1100 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
70.40GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
1792
Shading Units
112
112
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.80 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
362.9 GFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

190W
TDP
120W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
G92B
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
G92-240-B1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy