Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs Intel Arc A350

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs Intel Arc A350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (345.6GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
Lower TDP (25W vs 580W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290X2 +83%
5.632 TFLOPS
Arc A350
3.072 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Jan 2022
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
345.6GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
768
176
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
176.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
5.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
704.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

580W
TDP
25W
950 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
4x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
DG2-128
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy