Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs AMD FirePro S9170

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs AMD FirePro S9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 and 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (345.6GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (275W vs 580W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290X2 +7%
5.632 TFLOPS
FirePro S9170
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Jul 2015
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
512bit
345.6GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
2816
176
TMUs
176
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
176.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
704.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Board Design

580W
TDP
275W
950 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
4x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Hawaii
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy