Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs Intel Xe DG1

AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs Intel Xe DG1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 360 OEM and 4GB VRAM Xe DG1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (104.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Intel Xe DG1 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 48% (1550MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (30W vs 85W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 360 OEM
1.613 TFLOPS
Xe DG1 +23%
1.984 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Unknown
Pirate Islands
Generation
Xe Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
104.0GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
640
48
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
20
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.00 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
62.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.968 TFLOPS
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.984 TFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
496.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 3x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tobago
GPU Name
DG1
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
Unknown
160 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy