CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM
VS
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 512MB VRAM GeForce 205 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
4080 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 275W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X
+19015%
8.602 TFLOPS
GeForce 205 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X
VS
GeForce 205 OEM
Graphics Card
Jun 2015
Release Date
Nov 2009
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
4096
Shading Units
16
256
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
8.602 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
275W
TDP
31W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Fiji
GPU Name
GT218
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GPU Variant
GT218-200-B1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM
2
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
3
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE v2
4
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs Intel H3C XG310
5
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD FirePro S9100
6
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition
7
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 GDDR6
8
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon HD 6750
9
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA P104 101
10
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Related News
1
AMD's Thunderous Strike: Ryzen 9 9950X3D Performance Scores Revealed for the First Time!
2
Continuous Decline in DRAM Memory Prices: Downward Trend Intensifies
3
NVIDIA GB202 Chip Unveiled for the First Time, to be Used in RTX 5090 with 512-bit GDDR7 Memory
4
Strix Halo Integrated Graphics Score Appears on Passmark, Currently Slightly Below RTX 3060 12GB
5
AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT
6
Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card
7
CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory
8
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
9
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
10
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy