Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 512MB VRAM GeForce 205 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
4080 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X +19015%
8.602 TFLOPS
GeForce 205 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Nov 2009
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
4096
Shading Units
16
256
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
8.602 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

275W
TDP
31W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
GT218
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GPU Variant
GT218-200-B1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy