Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 256MB VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 2600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1672 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition +2390%
2.989 TFLOPS
Mobility Radeon HD 2600
0.12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
May 2007
Crystal System
Generation
M7x
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
120
112
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
120.0 GFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
M76
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GPU Variant
M76-M (216MJBKA13FG)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy