Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5250

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5250

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 256MB VRAM Mobility FireGL V5250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jan 2007
Crystal System
Generation
Mobility FireGL
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
350 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
-
128
TMUs
12
32
ROPs
12
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.400 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.400 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
M66
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
M66-P (216BGCKC13FG)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy