Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD FirePro V5900

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +1234%
8.192 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
May 2011
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
8
4096
Shading Units
512
256
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
Cayman
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Board Design

175W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy